MOHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/30623/2025 · 2025-09-10
Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89694 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89694 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30623 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard Sri Parth Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri D.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority and Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The instant writ petition is preferred for a direction commanding the respondent to remove the petitioners' land from the Green Belt of the proposed Master Plan 2031. Alternatively, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to decide the representations dated 18.2.2022 and
24.7.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 and 2 are the owners of land bearing Khasra no. 641 area 1.4190 hectare and Khasra no. 642 area 1.1400 hectares, respectively, situate in village-Jaut, Tehsil-Sadar, District-Mathura. The grievance of the petitioners is that their lands are earmarked in the proposed Master Plan 2031 as 'Green Belt' and the petitioners have been restrained from raising any constructions over the said land. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have moved representation before the concerned Authority but no order has been passed till date.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue involved, with the consent of parties herein, the writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that the representation of the petitioners dated 24.7.2025 be considered and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Namit Srivastava, Parul Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dharmendra Singh Chauhan Mohan Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
decided by the respondent no. 3 in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of the instant order. The respondent no. 3 while deciding the representation shall give an opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders. September 11, 2025 Kirti WRIC No. 30623 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad