MUSTKEEM AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/18979/2025 · 2025-09-08
Santosh Rai, Siddharth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18979 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1.Vakalatnama filed by Sri Manu Khare, learned counsel on behalf of respondent no.4 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Manu Khare, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned AGA for State-respondents.
3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 30.07.2025, registered as Case Crime No.348 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) and 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
4. With regard to the allegations made in the F.I.R., investigating officer of the police is investigating the matter.
5. After hearing the rival contentions, totality of facts and circumstances of this case and in view of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ petition No. 7463/2024 (Shobhit Nehra Vs. State of U.P.), the above noted writ petition is disposed of directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of this case within period of 60 days.
6. During the period of investigation and till cognizance is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.
7. In case of non-cooperation with the police investigation by the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, Vikrant Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditya Upadhyay, G.A. Mustkeem And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner/petitioners, it shall be open for either of the respondents to file recall application of this order.
8. It is made clear that during pendency of the investigation the petitioners shall not alienate the disputed property which was executed on the basis of disputed agreement. September 9, 2025 Asha CRLP No. 18979 of 2025 2 (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad