APHC010098262013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18250/2013 Between: 1. EX-SERVICEMEN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD, (NO. B. 1468) GULLALAPALEM/MULAGADA, MALAKAPURAM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 011. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT KAVALLA AK A RAO S/O LATE K. PARAMESWARA RAO, AGED 64 FEARS, OCC : RTD. EMPLOYEE, R/O X-MIG, 93-94, EX-SERVICEMEN COLONY, NEAR VENKATESHWARA TEMPLE, OPP: ANJANEYA TEMPLE, GAJUWAKA, RTC DEPOT., VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 026. ...PETITIONER AND 1. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION HUDCO, REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, HUDCO HOUSE, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 003 2. HUDCO REGIONAL OFFICE, REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HACA BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, DOOR NO. 5-10-193, OPP: PUBLIC GARDENS, HYDERABAD - 500 004 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass necessary orders and directions in the nature of Writ of mandamus directing the officials of Respondents or concerned officials acting on their behalf to protect and to safe guard the fully paid Members on the trust of the payment made by them by duly releasing the hypothecated documents and Pattas of fully paid Members of Writ Petitioner Society in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 95895 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUDHAKAR RAO KULKARNI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 25.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 27.06.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18250 of 2013 Date: 27.06.2025 IKN