Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89669 (ALL)

MEENU TYAGI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/32370/2025 · 2025-09-16

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32370 of 2025 . Court No. - 74 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the applicant corrected the prayer clause. Sri Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.N. Upadhyay, learned brief holder for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the order dated 20.01.2025 as well as 10.06.2025 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court no. 2, Ghaziabad in Execution Case No. 314 of 2022, (Meenu Tyagi Vs. Umesh Kumar Tyagi) arising out of an application under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C., whereby after depositing a cheque of Rs. 94,740/- by private opposite party no. 2, recovery order dated 17.09.2024 has been stayed and both the parties are directed to filed status of criminal revision, which is pending before this Court. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar, Nandini Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Meenu Tyagi .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 17, 2025 #Vik/- NA528 No. 32370 of 2025 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad