Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89664 (ALL)

MEHRAJUDDIN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12882/2025 · 2025-08-31

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 12882 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Parvez Iqbal Ansari, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri B.M. Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. Petitioner has opted Voluntary Retirement Scheme. However, he is aggrieved that a substantial amount from his due gratuity was deducted without assigning any specific reason. 3. Learned Standing Counsel by referring a document annexed alongwith this writ petition, submits that since petitioner was under suspension from 11th August, 2014 to 07th July, 2017 however continuity and conditions of order of reinstatement are not on record, therefore, it may be a reason to deduct some amount from gratuity. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that said order is not on record. 5. In aforesaid circumstances, an opportunity is granted to petitioner to place his case before concerned respondent, who will consider the case and intimate reasons for deducting amount of gratuity, within a short period. 6. With aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. September 1, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parvez Iqbal Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Mehrajuddin .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad