Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 741 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
1 . SRI MUNIYAPPA R S/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/A NO 15/1(OLD SY NO 7/4B), SRINIVAGILU MAIN ROAD, SRINIVAGILU, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, VIVEKANAGAR POST, BANGALORE
2 . SRI VENKATESH S/O KAVERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO 31, 1ST MAIN SRINIVAGILU, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, BANGALORE ...Appellants (BY SRI.T.K.RAJAGOPAL, Advocate)
AND 1 . SMT PUTTAMMA D/O LATE MUNIRAMAIAH @ MUGAPPA, W/O LATE PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT NO 15, SRINIVAGILU MAIN ROAD, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, VIVEKANAGAR, BANGALORE
RFA.No.741/2023 -------------------------
2 2 . SMT KRISHNAMMA D/O LATE MUNIRAMAIAH @ MUGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/A NO 15, SRINIVAGILU MAIN ROAD, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, VIVEKANAGAR, BANGALORE.
3 . SMT RATHNAMMA D/O LATE MUNIRAMAIAH @ MUGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO 15, SRINIVAGILU MAIN ROAD, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, VIVEKANAGAR, BANGALORE
4 . SRI DHANMAL SINGHVI S/O K JUGRAJ, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT NO 34/6, 5TH CROSS, BANGIYAPPA GARDEN, LAKSHMI ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE.
5 . SRI ANIL SINGHVI S/O DHANMAL SINGHVI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A NO 34/6, 5TH CROSS, BANGIYAPPA GARDEN, LAKSHMI ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE. …Respondents
(BY SRI.M.MOHAN KUMAR, Advocate for R5, R1 and R4 are served and unrepresented; Notice to R2 and R3 are dispensed with.)
This Regular First Appeal filed Under Section 96 of CPC., against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.03.2023 passed in O.S. No.7985/2017 on the file of the 69TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
RFA.No.741/2023 -------------------------
3 SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, dismissing the suit for injunction.
This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER Paper books to be filed within two weeks, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.11.09.2025, the advocate for appellant has not filed paper book. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : RM C By : STE