SRI. BOMMEGOWDA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES v. SYED MUSTAFA KAMAL PASHA
WP/35253/2024 · 2025-07-21
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89654 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89654 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27174 WP No. 35253 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 35253 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI. BOMMEGOWDA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
1.
SRI BOMMEGOWDA, S/O LATE BOMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
2.
SRI RAMACHANDREGOWDA S/O LATE BOMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT JAKKEGOWDANADODDI VILLAGE, SATHANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 126. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.S. MUKARRAM, ADVOCATE) AND:
SYED MUSTAFA KAMAL PASHA, S/O SYED GHOUSE MOHIDEEN SAHEB, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES,
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27174 WP No. 35253 of 2024
1.
SMT FARHATH UNNISA, W/O LATE SYED MUSTAFA KAMAL PASHA, MAJOR,
2.
SYED AKBAR PASHA S/O LATE SYED MUSTAFA KAMAL PASHA, MINOR,
3.
KUM. SHEHATIA KAMAL D/O LATE SYED MUSTAFA KAMAL PASHA, MINOR,
4.
SYED SHARADH S/O LATE SYED MUSTAFA KAMAL PASHA, MINOR,
RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 4 ARE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. FARHATH UNNISA, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF ACHALU VILLAGE, SATHANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 126. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NATARAJ BABA K., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN IRA NO. 5116/2018 PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE RAMANAGARA SITTING AT KANAKAPURA AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27174 WP No. 35253 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners are before this Court calling in question an order of the First Appellate Court.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the First Appellate Court has disposed the appeal itself.
3. In that light, the petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed as having become infructuous.
SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 112 CT: BHK