IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 Satnam Singh and others Tejveer Singh, Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Local Government, Punjab and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated 28.1.2025 Court in CWP State of Punjab and another” vide which, the respondents were directed “…to consider the grievance put forth by the petitioners in legal notice dated 17.9.2024 (Annexure P are found t to them, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order….”. COCP-4006-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4006 of 2025 Date of decision : Satnam Singh and others Versus Singh, Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Local Government, Punjab and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Dr. Ameena Upmanyu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Dharminder Singh Randhawa, Advocate for respondent No.2. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 28.1.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-2290 of 2025 titled as “Satnam Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another” vide which, the respondents were “…to consider the grievance put forth by the petitioners in legal notice dated 17.9.2024 (Annexure P are found to be payable to the petitioners, the same shall be released to them, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order….”. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4006 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-12.08.2025 …..Petitioners Singh, Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Local Government, Punjab and another …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Dr. Ameena Upmanyu, Advocate Mr. Dharminder Singh Randhawa, Advocate Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Satnam Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another” vide which, the respondents were “…to consider the grievance put forth by the petitioners in legal notice dated 17.9.2024 (Annexure P-3), and in case any dues o be payable to the petitioners, the same shall be released to them, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 18.45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Memorandum of Appearance submits that the decision in the case of the petitioner been taken vide order dated 17.6.2025 (Annexure P case of the petitioner the petitioner the case of the petitioners has already been forwarded to the concerned authority i.e. respondent No.1, who has called for the records of respondent No.2 within two months from today. passed in the present petition, the same is August 12 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-4006-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 Memorandum of Appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that the decision in the case of the petitioner been taken vide order dated 17.6.2025 (Annexure P case of the petitioners has been approved and it has been found that the petitioners are entitled for enhanced pension. It is submitted that the case of the petitioners has already been forwarded to the concerned authority i.e. respondent No.1, who has called for the records of the case and is pending approval. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 further undertakes to comply with the directions within two months from today. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 12, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 files the on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that the decision in the case of the petitioners has already been taken vide order dated 17.6.2025 (Annexure P-2) whereby the has been approved and it has been found that s are entitled for enhanced pension. It is submitted that the case of the petitioners has already been forwarded to the concerned authority i.e. respondent No.1, who has called for the the case and is pending approval. Learned counsel for to comply with the directions In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 18.45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document