IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 127 VINAY ATRI STATE OF HARYAN CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. Present : Mr Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Ms. Divyyanshu Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Ms. Anisha Rana, Advocates. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. Face incidence of service and the discretion of the employer to formulate appropriate policy shown to be arbitrary or petitioners comes up 2. Accordingly, the present 3. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. AUGUST 19, 2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.23207 of 2025 Date of decision: VINAY ATRI AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate for the Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Ms. Divyyanshu Kaushik, Ms. Simran Sharma, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Ms. Anisha Rana, Advocates. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (oral) Faced with the observation of the Court that transfer is incidence of service and the discretion of the employer to formulate appropriate policy for transfer is not to be interfered with shown to be arbitrary or violative of any statutory rule, learned counsel for the comes up with the prayer to withdraw this Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA (ROHIT KAPOOR AUGUST 19, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.23207 of 2025 Date of decision: 19.08.2025 …. Petitioners Versus AND OTHERS …. Respondent ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Kaushik, Ms. Simran Sharma, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Ms. Anisha Rana, Advocates. with the observation of the Court that transfer is an incidence of service and the discretion of the employer to formulate is not to be interfered with lightly, unless it is violative of any statutory rule, learned counsel for the with the prayer to withdraw this petition. is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No an incidence of service and the discretion of the employer to formulate is violative of any statutory rule, learned counsel for the ) Jyoti 2025.08.21 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document