- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32449 WP No. 5884 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.5884 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR. KUMARA SWAMY S/O SWAMY GOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.254 I FLOOR, THYAGAR MARGA SIDDARTHA LAYOUT, MYSORE-570010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHASKAR C.R., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. A.R. BHAVYA SHREE W/O KUMARASWAMY D/O LATE RAJASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.249/1 BEHIND SACCHIDANANDA ASHRAMA 11TH CROSS, GUNDURAO NAGRA MYSORE-570025 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SUNEEL S. NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09-01-2024 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSORE, ON I.A.NO.II FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE PARTLY ALLOWING THE SAID APPLICATION HOLDING THAT THE PETITIONER HEREIN IS LIABLE TO PAY RS.10,000/-(RUPEES TEN THOUSANDS PER MONTH) FROM THE DATE OF APPLICATION TILL THE DISPOSAL OF THIS CASE AND FURTHER HELD THE PETITIONER LIABLE T PAY RS.5.000/-(RUPEES FIVE Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32449 WP No. 5884 of 2024 THOUSANDS ONLY) TOWARDS THE ONE TIME LITIGATION EXPENSES TO THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER When this matter came up on 21.03.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Again on 20.06.2025, there was no representation on either side on call and to give a fair opportunity, the matter was directed to be listed on 31.07.2025. On 31.07.2025 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' today. 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3