- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32275 RSA No. 93 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 93 OF 2022 (SP) BETWEEN: SMT. BORAMMA WIFE OF LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.400, BEHIND SRIRAMA TEMPLE VAKKALAGERI, NANJANGUDU TOWN MYSURU DIST- 570009. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.V. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: SMT. RUKMINI WIFE OF KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.2359, 3RD CR OSS HOSA BEEDI, K.G. KOPPALU MYSURU DIST- 570009. …RESPONDENT *** THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.09/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., NANJANGUD, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.03.2018 PASSED IN Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32275 RSA No. 93 of 2022 O.S.NO.76/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., NANJANGUD. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the appellant. 2. This Court, by order dated 05.01.2024 had granted a week's time to comply the office objections, on payment of cost of `1,000/-. Till today, neither the office objections are complied nor cost is paid. 3. Taking note of the fact that the appeal is pending since the year 2022, only for rectification of the office objections and learned counsel for the appellant has failed to comply the office objections, despite granting sufficient time, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4