Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89628 (KAR)

MR. PRAMOD A @ GAJA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/742/2023 · 2025-11-13

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46267 CRL.RP No. 742 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 742 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. PRAMOD A @ GAJA S/O ANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/A BOMMANA KATTE, KENCHAMMANA BEEDI, SHIVAMOGGA TQ AND DISTRICT - 577 204. …PETITIONER (BY SRI H MALATESH , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND TALUK MAGISTRATE, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 204. 2. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, VINOBHANAGARA POLICE STATION, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 204. 3. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, BAJARA POLICE STATION, KALBURGI DISTRICT - 585 101. REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT -STATE ) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER BEARING NO.MAG CR.NO.115/2022-23 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29.03.2023 IN OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, SHIVAMOGGA. Digitally signed by GURURAJ D Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46267 CRL.RP No. 742 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 29.03.2023 bearing no.JA.J.f ¹Dgï 115/2022-23 passed by Assistant Commissioner/Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Shimoga Sub-Division, Shimoga, this Revision Petition is filed. 2. Sri H. Malatesh, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that period of externment under impugned order was for one year i.e., from 29.03.2023 to 29.03.2024, which has been expired during pendency of this revision petition. Therefore, impugned order is spent. 3. Smt.N. Anitha Girish, learned HCGP for respondents does not dispute submission. 4. In view of above, revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30