Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:63002 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28295 of 2024 Applicant :- Pramod And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramsagar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Radhey Shyam Yadav Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 122 of 2016 (State versus Pramod and Others) arising out of N.C.R. No. 259 of 2015, Under Sections 323, 504 of I.P.C., Police Station-Kayamganj, District- Farrukhabad pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Kayamganj Farrukhabad in pursuance of compromise dated 20.05.2024. 3. The opposite party no. 2 lodged NCR against the applicants. It is alleged in the NCR that the goat of the applicants climbed on the roof of the informant then some dispute arose between them and named accused persons started abusive language and when she prevented them, they assaulted the informant by kick and fists and also by lathi and danda. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants challenged the aforesaid proceedings by way of filing instant 482 Application and the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2024 after hearing and considering that parties entered into compromise, sent the matter before the trial court for verification of the parties. 4. Pursuant to the said order dated 11.09.2024, the parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the contents of the compromise made between the parties, order dated 03.10.2024 has been passed by the court verifying the said compromise. A copy of the same is annexed with the bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 6. Learned A.G.A. and counsel for the opposite party no. 2 do not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Case No. 122 of 2016 (State versus Pramod and Others) arising out of N.C.R. No. 259 of 2015, Under Sections 323, 504 of I.P.C., Police Station-Kayamganj, District-Farrukhabad, is hereby quashed. 9. This application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad