HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30710 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Raj Prajapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Bushra Maryam, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 to 4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Counselor in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jalaun at Orai." 3. Upon a specific query put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to under which provision of law the petitioner claims a right to be appointed as a Counselor in the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jalaun at Orai, he was unable to point out any such provision. Even otherwise, upon perusal of the record of the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has only obtained certain information under the Right to Information Act. 4. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any merit in the writ petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. September 25, 2025 Karan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Maurya, Ram Raj Prajapati Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Mishra, C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt. Meena Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad