COCP-3971 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 Brish Bhan @ Brichh Bhan Sh. Uma Shankar Gupta, IAS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. record. 2. 25.03.2025 CWP-8353 and others’ Legal Notice dated of 02 months dated 09.12.2024 is prayed that contempt proceedings be 3. aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the pe that the order dated with by respondent No. 4 3971-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Brish Bhan @ Brichh Bhan Versus Sh. Uma Shankar Gupta, IAS and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. PKS Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. AS Kakkar, Advocate for respondent No. 4. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 4 is taken on Learned counsel for the petitioner submits 25.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 8353-2025 titled as ‘Brish Bhan @ Brichh Bhan ’, respondent No. 4 was directed Legal Notice dated 09.12.2024 submitted by the petitioner within a period of 02 months. It is submitted that despite 09.12.2024 of the petitioner has not been decided till date. Thus, it is prayed that contempt proceedings be initiated against the Learned counsel for the respondent aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the pe that the order dated 25.03.2025 (Annexure P by respondent No. 4; and the legal notice dated IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3971-2025 Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. PKS Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. AS Kakkar, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 4 is taken on Learned counsel for the petitioner submits vide order dated -ordinate Bench of this Court in Brish Bhan @ Brichh Bhan vs. State of Punjab was directed to consider and decide the submitted by the petitioner within a period It is submitted that despite the clear direction, legal notice of the petitioner has not been decided till date. Thus, it itiated against the respondents. respondent No. 4 controverts the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and submits (Annexure P-1) has been duly complied and the legal notice dated 09.12.2024 submitted Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 4 is taken on vide order dated Bench of this Court in State of Punjab to consider and decide the submitted by the petitioner within a period , legal notice of the petitioner has not been decided till date. Thus, it the titioner and submits 1) has been duly complied RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3971 by the petitioner stands decided due payments have also been released to him. the respondent 4. by learned counsel for has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner 5. passed in the present petition 6. speaking order, in accordance with law. 7. 8. 11.08.2025 rishu 3971-2025 -2- by the petitioner stands decided vide order dated 08.08.2025 due payments have also been released to him. respondent No. 4 submits that nothing survives in the present petition. A copy of the order dated 08.08.2025 by learned counsel for respondent No. 4 is also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid speaking order, in accordance with law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 11.08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable vide order dated 08.08.2025. Even the due payments have also been released to him. Thus, learned counsel for submits that nothing survives in the present petition. 08.08.2025, handed over in Court is taken on record. Copy thereof, also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. no further orders are required to be stands disposed of, accordingly. would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Even the , learned counsel for , handed over in Court no further orders are required to be would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.