SMT. SAROJANI BAI CHANDRAKAR v. CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
WPC/1126/2025 · 2025-03-17
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8957 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8957 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:12663
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1126 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sarojani Bai Chandrakar W/o Shri Parasram Chandrakar Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Karra, Post Darrighat, Tahsil And Police Station Masturi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Through Commissioner, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - District Election Commission Through Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Returning Officer Tahsildar Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Sandhya Yadav W/o Lavlesh Verma (Pasi) (Schedule Caste), Village Karra, Post Darrighat, Tahsil And Police Station Masturi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. B. L. Sahu, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. R. K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.03.24 12:39:12 +0530
2 Order on Board 17/03/2025
1. Heard Mr. B. L. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General for the State/respondent/s.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file a duly constituted Election Petition.
3. On the other hand learned counsel for the respondent has not opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Permission is granted as the above submission is fair and reasonable. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file appropriate Election Petition before the competent authority.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate Election Petition in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Ravi Mandavi