Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8956 (UTT)

SUNITA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1741/2020 · 2025-03-24

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2129 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 24.03. 2025. WPCRL No.1741 of 2020 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Heard Mr. Vinod Chandra, learned counsel holding brief of Mrs. Neetu Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed by the Investigating Officer. 3. After the said submission, Mr. Vinod Chandra, Advocate, has submitted that the present writ petition has become infructuous. 4. The present Writ Petition (WPCRL No.1741 of 2020) is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 24.03.2025 Pant/ 2025:UHC:2129