Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89539 (PNJ)

JAGIR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/43733/2025 · 2025-09-24

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 289 CRM-M-43733-2025 Date of decision : 24.09.2025 JAGIR SINGH ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Raj Kumar Makked, Advocate for Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Sarabha, AAG, Punjab. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for anticipatory bail, in a case arising out of FIR No.65 dated 03.05.2025 Police Station Shri Hargobindpur, District Gurdaspur under Section 115(2), 118(1) & 3(5) of BNS. However it is relevant to note that Section 117(2), 118(2) BNS were invoked later on, vide GD No.12 dated 19.06.2025, 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has joined investigation. 3. In response to above-mentioned submission, learned State counsel, on the instructions, of ASI Sakkatar Singh has submitted that the VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.29 22:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-43733-2025 2 custody of the petitioner is not required for further investigation. He has also filed status report. The same be taken on record. 4. In view of above-mentioned submission, the order dated 12.08.2025 granting interim bail to the petitioner is hereby made absolute. 5. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 24.09.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.29 22:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order