CWP-23325 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Neha Guru Nanak Dev University and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. the Constitution of India, challenge is thrown to the orders/communications dated 20.11.2020 ( 21.09.2023, whereby, the Review Committee has petitioner to respondent No.2 (P-6). 2. the respondent competent authority has contemplated to rec petitioner. Accordingly, the and decided, in accordance with law. 3. pursue the matter. 23325-2025 -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Guru Nanak Dev University and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate, for the respondents. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) Through the instant writ petition, filed under Article the Constitution of India, challenge is thrown to the /communications dated 20.11.2020 ( 21.09.2023, whereby, the Review Committee has petitioner to revise her thesis. A Mandamus is also prayed for, to respondent No.2, to consider and decide Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate, causes appearance on behalf of the respondent-University on advance copy, and submits that the competent authority has contemplated to rec petitioner. Accordingly, the representation (supra), and decided, in accordance with law. Neither the petitioner, nor anyone on her behalf is present to pursue the matter. 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23325-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Through the instant writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge is thrown to the /communications dated 20.11.2020 (Annexure P-2), and 21.09.2023, whereby, the Review Committee has declined to permit the . A Mandamus is also prayed for, to direct to consider and decide her representation 27.01.2025 Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate, causes appearance on behalf of University on advance copy, and submits that the competent authority has contemplated to reconsider the claim of the representation (supra), will be considered Neither the petitioner, nor anyone on her behalf is present to 5 s 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge is thrown to the 2), and permit the direct representation 27.01.2025 Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate, causes appearance on behalf of University on advance copy, and submits that the onsider the claim of the be considered Neither the petitioner, nor anyone on her behalf is present to AMIT KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-23325 4. with a Mandamus upon the respondent the representation (supra), the order, and communicate the decision so taken, to the petitioner. 11.09.202 Ak Sharma 23325-2025 -2 In view of the above, the instant writ peti with a Mandamus upon the respondent-University to consider and decide the representation (supra), within three weeks the order, and communicate the decision so taken, to the petitioner. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2- instant writ petition is disposed of, University to consider and decide weeks from the date of passing of the order, and communicate the decision so taken, to the petitioner. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No , University to consider and decide from the date of passing of AMIT KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document