VED PRAKASH GUPTA v. SMT. J REEBHA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 3 OTHERS
CAPL/4531/2025 · 2025-09-21
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4531 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 26.8.2025, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party has produced the instruction, which is taken on record. On the basis of instruction, he submits that the order of the writ court has been complied with and the application has become infructuous, which is not objected by the learned counsel for the applicant. Therefore, under such facts of the case, no further order is required to be passed. Accordingly, file is consigned to record. September 22, 2025 Junaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akash Kishan, Ashok Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Ved Prakash Gupta .....Applicant(s) Smt. J Reebha, District Magistrate And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad