Tileshwar Singh @ Tileshwar Singh Bhokta v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./89291/2024 · 2025-01-27
Anil Kumar Sinha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89496 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89496 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89291 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2023 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Tileshwar Singh @ Tileshwar Singh Bhokta S/O Late Brahmdev Singh R/O Village- Dang, P.S- Barachatti, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 27-01-2025
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Barachatti PS case no. 276 of 2023, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 18/20/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
3. The prosecution story, as per the First Information Report, is that on secret information, the informant, who is the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, recovered 37 kg doda, 46 kg posto-dana and 1.5 kg ganja from the house of the petitioner.
4.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Learned counsel further submits that the house, from where ganja and other incriminating articles have been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89291 of 2024(2) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 recovered, is in joint possession. The petitioner is stated to be having a clean antecedent.
5. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that contraband items have been recovered from the house of the petitioner, which is more than the small quantity i.e. 1000 grams, as prescribed in N.D.P.S. Act, 1985, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected.
rinkee/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T