HARINDER KAUR BRAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/43471/2025 · 2025-08-11
Subhas Mehla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89494 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89494 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-43471-2025 Date of decision: 11.08.2025 HARINDER KAUR BRAR AND OTHERS ...Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Jaspreet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. ***** SUBHAS MEHLA
, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a matrimonial discord between the petitioners No.1 to 3 and respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 moved an application to the police department and the same was found to be false and frivolous. After that on the complaint of respondent No.2, the Magistrate, Faridkot has ordered for registration of the FIR, without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
2. Notice of motion.
3. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the FIR has been registered on the order of the Magistrate and the petitioners have a remedy to avail legal course, if they aggrieved from the order of the Magistrate. Priyanka Thakur 2025.08.19 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-43471-2025 :2:
4. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail efficacious remedy available to them under law.
5. In light of the above, the present petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) 11.08.2025 JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No Priyanka Thakur 2025.08.19 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document