ALLAMPATI NIRANJAN REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/2059/2025 · 2025-04-09
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8948 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8948 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010098192025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: Allampati Niranjan Reddy The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
1. The Criminal Petition, under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) is filed on behalf of the petitioner/accused to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime of 2021 of V. Satram Police Station,
2. A case has been registered against the the offence punishable under Sections
3. The prosecution's case, in brief, is that the de facto complainan submitted a complaint to the police on 21.06.2021, stating that the accused persons (A.1 to A.3) were granted permission and a license to transport gravel IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2059/2025 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Court made the following: The Criminal Petition, under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) is filed on behalf of the to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime Police Station, SPSR Nellore District. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for the offence punishable under Sections 427 of IPC and 21(4) of MMDR Act. The prosecution's case, in brief, is that the de facto complainan submitted a complaint to the police on 21.06.2021, stating that the accused persons (A.1 to A.3) were granted permission and a license to transport gravel IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The Criminal Petition, under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) is filed on behalf of the to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.228 herein and others for and 21(4) of MMDR Act. The prosecution's case, in brief, is that the de facto complainant submitted a complaint to the police on 21.06.2021, stating that the accused persons (A.1 to A.3) were granted permission and a license to transport gravel
from Survepalli Reservoir, V. Satram Mandal.
However, it is alleged that A.1 to A.3 extracted gravel from the reservoir and transported an excess of 10,629 metric tons without obtaining the necessary permission from the concerned authorities. Based on this complaint, the police registered a case against the accused persons as outlined in the above-mentioned crime. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is apprehensive of being arrested in connection with the above crime i.e., Cr.No.228 of 2021 of V.Satram Police Station. In light of the same, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present Criminal Petition, seeking the relief of anticipatory bail. 5. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, representing the Respondent/State, submits that in response that, according to the material on record, the petitioner has not been named or shown as an accused in the proceedings. Therefore, there is no immediate threat or likelihood of arrest, and as such, the petition for anticipatory relief is unwarranted. 6. Having carefully considered the submissions of the both learned counsel, and duly noting the submissions made by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, this Court views that there are no sufficient grounds to continue with the proceedings in this matter. 7. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, with no further relief or orders being granted at this stage. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 09.04.2025 SAK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2059/2025
Date: 09.04.2025
SAK