HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32756 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed challenging the chargesheets dated 14.06.2024 and 07.11.2024, cognizance/ summoning order dated 08.03.2025 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2142 of 2025 (State vs. Taranjeet Singh @ Monu and another), arising out of Case Crime No.48 of 2024, under Sections 406, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Bilaspur, District-Rampur. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that both the applicants work as driver with the opposite party no.2 and the allegation against them is that they received sum of Rs.7,00,000/- after delivering eatables i.e. vegetables etc. to one Mintu but did not pay the money to the informant. Referring to the statement of Mintu, it is contended that allegation of receiving Rs.7,00,000/- is false, inasmuch as, Mintu had stated delivery of goods worth Rs.2,97,635/- 4. Learned A.G.A. points out that complete statement of Mintu reveals that payment of Rs.7,00,000/- was stated by him in the manner that such amount relates to past and present transactions and was paid in lump sum. 5. Though learned counsel for the applicants tried to justify the stand of the applicants regarding transactions, however, the Court is not convinced Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Tiwari, Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Taranjeet Singh @ Monu and another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and another .....Opposite Party(s) so as to interfere with the passing of the impugned summoning order or to stall proceedings of the concerned criminal case. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant prays to issue appropriate direction to the concerned court below to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & another : (2022) 10 SCC 51, to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 7. It is, therefore, directed that if the accused-applicant surrenders before the court below and move bail application within 30 days from today, the court below shall decide the bail application according to the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicant. 9. The instant application is, accordingly, disposed of. September 9, 2025 Jyotsana NA528 No. 32756 of 2025 2 (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad