Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8947 (AP)

PANDHI SUBRAMANYAM v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/5210/2025 · 2025-03-28

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010097182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 5210/2025 Between: 1. PANDHI SUBRAMANYAM, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.PEDURU VILLAGE, THOTAPALLI GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, THOTAPALLI GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE PEDURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, PEDURU VILLAGE, THOTAPALI GUDUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri M. Veerendranth, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri C. Subodh, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri V. Sai Kiran, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat. 2. Sri V. Sai Kiran, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Panchayat Secretary, dated 26.03.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The relevant portion of the Written Instructions is usefully extracted hereunder: “Para 4: Peduru Grama panchayat of T.P.Gudur mandal withdrawn its proposal of construction of cement road from Narukuru-T.P.Gudur road to Chamundeswari devi temple which the petitioner opposed road.” 4. The above extract would indicate that the Peduru Grama Panchayat has withdrawn its proposal for the construction of cement road from Narukuru-T.P. Gudur Road to Chamundeswari Devi Temple. 5. Having recorded the same, this Court is of the opinion that this Writ Petition can be disposed of in terms of the above extract. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 28.03.2025 DSV 3