Crl.O.P.No.26069 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P.No. 26069 of 2025 M.Vijayakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sholinganallur, Chennai – 119. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Tambaram, Chennai – 45. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Asst.Commissioner of Police, Pallavaram, Chennai – 43. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, to direct the 3rd respondent Police to comply with the order in Crl.O.P.No.18299 of 2025 passed by this Court on 30.06.2025 and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent Police to restrain himself from conducting petition enquiry in C.No.420/ACP PVM/COP PG/2025 against the petitioner. Page Nos.1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.26069 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sooriakanth For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinoth Raja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the third respondent-Police to comply with the directions of this Court dated 30.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.18299 of 2025 and consequently, direct the third respondent-Police to restrain himself from conducting petition enquiry in C.No.420/ACP PVM/COP PG/2025 against the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner is that despite the order of this Court dated 30.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.18299 of 2025, the petitioner has been repeatedly called for enquiry by the third respondent-Police, though, whenever the petitioner had received summons, he appeared before the third respondent-Police and extended his fullest co-operation for enquiry. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents-Police, on instructions, submitted that while disposing the petition in Crl.O.P.No.18299 of 2025, dated 30.06.2025, this Court directed the petitioner to co-operate for enquiry/investigation. However, Page Nos.2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.26069 of 2025 even after service of summons, the petitioner has not appeared. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the third respondent-Police, is hereby directed to serve notice afresh on the petitioner by fixing the date of enquiry, on such service, the petitioner is directed to co-operate for enquiry/investigation. Thereafter, the respondent-Police shall proceed as per law. 5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 22.09.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms Page Nos.3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.26069 of 2025 To 1. The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Sholinganallur, Chennai – 119. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Tambaram, Chennai – 45. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pallavaram, Chennai – 43. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page Nos.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.26069 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR, J. ms Crl.O.P.No.26069 of 2025 22.09.2025 Page Nos.5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis