IQBAL SINGH ALIAS KUNAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/23197/2025 · 2025-08-20
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89451 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89451 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
130 Iqbal Singh Alias Kunan Singh
State of Punjab
CORAM: HON
Present :
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
appointed as Gram Sewak on the b rendered in 16142-2014. evoked any response wherein his claim has been raised. instructions, prays tha decide the same in a time bound manner
2.
made.
3.
merits of the case, this petition is he the respondents to decide the representation IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Iqbal Singh Alias Kunan Singh
Versus f Punjab and Others
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is entitled to be appointed as Gram Sewak on the basis of judgment dated rendered in Sitara Singh vs. State of Punjab and another
2014. His representation dated 06.02.2025, Annexure P evoked any response wherein his claim has been raised. instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23197-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 20.08.2025
....Petitioner
...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Advocate,
Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is entitled to be asis of judgment dated 31.01.2020 Sitara Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, CWP- His representation dated 06.02.2025, Annexure P-20, has not evoked any response wherein his claim has been raised. He, on t a direction may be given to the respondents to Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer In view of the above and without commenting upon the reby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 06.02.2025, within a
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.21 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.
CWP-23197-2025
-2- period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
20.08.2025
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.21 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.