Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.312 of 2025 Date of decision: 21.04.2025 Sunil Acharya & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned action has already been assailed by the petitioners by way of a separate writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, present proceedings may be closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievances at the appropriate stage. 2. Granting such liberty, this contempt proceedings are closed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 21st April, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)