1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS & MRS.JAYASHREE KRISHNAMURTHY, MEMBER W.P. No.12812/2025 (Lok Adalat No.6853/2025) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHADRAMMA W/O. LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 2. SRI RUDRESH S/O. LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. SRI MANOHAR S/O. LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS ALL ARE R/A UNNIGERE VILLAGE THAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562 130. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI VIRUPAKSHAIAH P. H., ADVOCATE) 2 AND: 1. 2. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M. S. BUILDING, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU - 560 009. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MOHAMMAD JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES MORE PARTICULARLY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.10.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE - D AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS FOR CANCELLATION OF FORFEITURE (PHADA) AND ENTER THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.77/10 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 20 GUNTAS SITUATED AT AJJANAHALLI VILLAGE, TAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK EXPEDITIOUSLY. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The prayer in this writ petition is to issue a direction to the third respondent-Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, to consider the representation dated 18.10.2008 at Annexure ‘D’ and pass appropriate orders for cancellation of forfeiture (PADA) and enter the names of the petitioners in the revenue records in respect of land bearing Sy.No.77/10 measuring 20 guntas situated at Ajjanahalli Village, Tavarekere Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that in terms of the decision of this Court in the case of Shivanna Vs. Deputy Commissioner in W.P.No.19639/2021 dated 05.09.2022, the grievance of the petitioners will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned Additional Government Advocate and learned Counsel 4 for the petitioners submitting that the petitioners will be satisfied if such action is taken, the matter stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER JT/- CT:VC