- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52036 WP No. 7448 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 7448 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: MUNIKRISHNA K. S/O KAKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.461, KODICHIKKANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BENGALURU - 562 106. 3. SRI BHADRAREDDY, S/O LATE CHIKKA VEERAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52036 WP No. 7448 of 2025 4. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA, W/O LATE JAYARAMAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 5. SRI MANJUNATHA J. S/O LATE JAYARAMAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. 6. SRI MURALIKUMAR S. S/O LATE SHIVARAMAREDDY M., AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NOS.3 TO 6 ARE R/AT CHIKKATHIMMASANDRA VILLAGE, MUTHANALLURU POST, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 099. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. V.R. BALARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R3, R4 AND R5; SRI. H.M. MOHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTRY OF APPEAL NO.RA/ANE/951/2024 IN COLUMN NO.11 OF RTC IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.86/2(B) MEASURING 08 GUNTAS SITUATED AT CHIKKATHIMMASANDRA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK IN APPEAL NO.RA/ANE/951/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52036 WP No. 7448 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed to set aside the entry in column No.11 of RTC in respect of land bearing Survey No.86/2(B) measuring 08 guntas situated at Chikkathimmasandra Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk. 2. It is submitted that the entry in column No.11 operates prejudicially as regards the rights of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo and submits that an interim order was passed on 12.02.2025 and has been in operation as on date. 4. Taking note that the proceedings are pending before the Appellate Authority, petition could be disposed of, while observing that in the event of any modification of the interim order passed, revenue authorities to make appropriate entry in column No.11. Subject to such - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52036 WP No. 7448 of 2025 observation, no grounds are made out to grant relief as prayed for. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR