Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89427 (KAR)

MEHADIYA BANU v. MOHAMMED ABDUL SAMAD

MFA/7002/2025 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. ARAVIND & Dr. S.V. GIRIKUMAR, CONCILIATOR M.F.A.No.7002 OF 2025 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.8367/2025) BETWEEN: 1. MEHADIYA BANU, W/O LATE MOHAMMED AYAZ @ AYAZ PASHA @AYAZ, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, 2. AYESHA, D/O LATE MOHAMMED AYAZ AYAZ PASHA @ AYAZ, AGED ABOUT 06 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT 1ST CROSS, SADATH NAGARA, MANDYA CITY-571403. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.L. SREENIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MOHAMMED ABDUL SAMAD, S/O HAMSA MUSLYAR, AGE NOT KNOWN, BUT MAJOR, 2 R/AT MEYOTTIL CHERIYAMANDATH, KULAPULLY POST, SHORNUR-679122, OTTAPALAM, PALAKAAD, KERALA STATE, BY ITS MANAGER. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., OPP. RAILWAY STATION, M.C.ROAD, MANDYA CITY-571401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JANARDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.04.10.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO. 204/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANDYA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellants - claimants are present. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent -Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- CONCILIATOR DDU