RAMPARAS PASI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/31936/2025 · 2025-09-09
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89408 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89408 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31936 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Heard Shri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent and perused the record. 2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 B.N.S.S. for quashing the entire proceedings including charge- sheet dated 29.04.2022 and cognizance/summoning order dated 02.12.2022 in Criminal Case No. 48995 of 2022 (State Vs. Ramparas Pasi), arising out of Case Crime No.57 of 2022 under Sections 323, 504, 506, I.P.C., Police Station Mardah, District Ghazipur, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Court No.06, Ghazipur. 3. Having been aggrieved with the incident in question wherein respondent no.2 has been abused and beaten up causing grievous injury, an F.I.R. has been lodged by him being Case Crime No.0057 if 2922 dated 23.03.2022. 4. After due deliberations at length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he is not pursuing the instant application on merits. He has submitted that the applicants are ready and willing to cooperate with the court below and participate in the court proceedings provided some interim protection may be granted to them. It is next submitted that the present applicants have never intended to ignore the court proceedings. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if protection is granted to the present applicants to enable them to appear before the court below. 6. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep the instant application pending, therefore, the same is being decided finally Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramparas Pasi And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
without entering into the merits of the case with a direction that in case the present applicants appear/surrender and move bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned having considered the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court in accordance with law, expeditious, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. 7.
7. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicants. 8. With the aforesaid observation/direction, instant application is finally disposed of. September 10, 2025 VR NA528 No. 31936 of 2025 2 (Dinesh Pathak, J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad