106 CRWP-8589-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8589-2025 Date of decision: 12.08.2025 DILBAG SINGH ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G. Punjab. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This criminal writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the official respondents to get released the detenue namely Taranvir Singh from the illegal custody of respondent No. 3. 2. Vide order dated 07.08.2025 passed by this Court, a Warrant Officer was appointed to conduct the search at the premises of respondent No.3 of any place to be pointed out by the petitioner. 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, report of the Warrant Officer has been received. A perusal thereof indicates that when the Warrant Officer reached CIA Nawanshahar and searched for the detenue- Taranvir Singh, he was not found there. However, on pointing out by the petitioner that the detenue is in Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District Puneet Sharma 2025.08.13 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 106 CRWP-8589-2025 -2- Sangrur, the Warrant Officer searched the concerned police station and the detenue in question was found present in the lock-up. Upon inquiry by the Warrant Officer, he was informed that the detenue was arrested on 06.08.2025 in case bearing FIR No.195 dated 05.08.2025 registered under Sections 109, 125, 3(5), 61(2) BNS and 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District Sangrur (Annexure R-3) and was produced before the Court on 07.08.2025 vide remand paper Annexure R-4. He has further stated that the Hon’ble Court had been pleased to grant one day police remand and the accused will be produced before Court in due course of law. Copy of the statement of Incharge-CIA, SBS Nagar, copy of general diary is attached with the report of Warrant Officer. 4. In view of the above, no further directions are required to be passed in the present petition and the same stands disposed of accordingly. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 12.08.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.08.13 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment