- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53142-DB RFA No. 624 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 624 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUSPA T M W/O LATE SANATHKUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. KUMARI S AISHWARYA D/O LATE SANATH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.157, 7TH CROSS NAVELU ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGAR MYSURU-24 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI RAGHU PRASAD B S, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. SRIJAYA MOHAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS W/O V N MOHAN D/O LATE B KRISHNAN R/AT #46 AB, NANDI KRIPA 9TH MAIN, M.C. LAYOUT BINNY LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE-40 Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53142-DB RFA No. 624 of 2018 2. KUM CHANDRIKA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS D/O LATE B. KRISHNAN R/AT PUSHPA NILAYA NO.205, NAVILU ROAD RAMAKRISHNANAGAR MYSORE-24 3. SMT. RADHIKA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS D/O LATE B. KRISHNAN W/O DR. A.R. VENUGOPAL R/AT NO.769, 6TH CROSS 12TH MAIN KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD SARASWATHIPURAM MYSORE-24 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VINAY D HOSMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 [ABSENT]); VIDE ORDER DATED 02.12.2025, APPEAL AGAINST R-3 STANDS ABATED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.03.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.86/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53142-DB RFA No. 624 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) 1. We have taken up this appeal in the revised call. No one is present to press this appeal either in the first call or in the revised call. The order sheet also would reflect that several adjournments have been taken. In view thereof, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending IAs, if any, do not survive for consideration and accordingly, they stand disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE BKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10