SMT. SAUMYA YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/29148/2025 · 2025-09-23
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89390 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89390 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29148 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and Shri Pradyumn Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. As per instructions so received by learned AGA, which is taken on record, it is submitted that as per report of Station House Officer, Police Station Chibramau, District Kannauj it transpired that petitioner no.1- Saumya Yadav is unmarried and she is residing with her parents and as such no cause of action arises in favour of the petitioners for seeking prayer as prayed through the instant petition.
4. In view of the above, prayer sought through the instant petition cannot be acceded to.
5. Writ petition stands dismissed. September 24, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Digvijay Singh, Dinesh Kumar Maurya, Kamala Shanker Yadav, Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradyumn Kumar (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Saumya Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad