KILARAPU SRINIVASA RAO v. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS
CC/1288/2024 · 2025-06-26
Ninala Jayasurya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8939 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8939 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010098052024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1288/2024 Between:
1. KILARAPU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. REDDYMMA AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 31-77, PAMARRU, PAMARRU MANDAL, N.T.R. DISTRICT, PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI S DILLI RAO I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING), VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT, PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. SRI NARAYAN REDDY, ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, MINOR AND MAJOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IRRIGATION BHAVAN,
VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. SRI T J H PRASAD BABU, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. SRI T J H PRASAD BABU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION,
2
VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT., PREVIUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR I A S, COMMISSIONER, COMMAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (CAD)
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT, PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT.
7. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT I A S, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents/ contemnors and punish them under Sections-10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court dt. 28.03.2023 passed W.P. 2744 of 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following: ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed in the writ petition has been complied. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in contempt case.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
3
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Date: 27th June, 2025
RKS