- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45424 WP No. 31990 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31990 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SHIVAMMA W/O RAMESHA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NAGANAHALLI PALYA VILLAGE, BETTADAPURA HOBLI, PIRIYAPATTANA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU-570 001. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PIRIYAPATTANA SUB-DIVISION, HUNASUR, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 001. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45424 WP No. 31990 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR PIRIYAPATTANA TALUK, PIRIYAPATTANA, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 001. 5. THE PRESIDENT COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF LAND PIRIYAPATTANA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR APPROPRIATE DIRECTION TO RESPONDENT NO.4 AND 5 THAT IS, TAHSILDAR, PIRIYAPATTANA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT AND COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF LAND, PIRIYAPATTANA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 30-09-2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-F AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS THEREON IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45424 WP No. 31990 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Petitioner has sought for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondents 4 and 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner. 2. Learned High Court Government Pleader files a copy of the order dated 11.12.2024 wherein the Deputy Commissioner has rejected the claim of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of the said order was not furnished to petitioner. 4. Accordingly, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 11.12.2024. If appeal is filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order, no objection must be raised as regards delay. 5. In light of the above, petition is disposed of. All contentions are kept open. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45424 WP No. 31990 of 2025 Office to return the original document / certified copy, if any after retaining the copy for reference. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP