Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89367 (PNJ)

DHEERAJ KUMAR AND ORS v. DEEPTI UPPAL AND ANR

COCP/3451/2024 · 2025-01-13

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DHEERAJ KUMAR AND ORS DEEPTI UPPAL AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Chauhan, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Ms. Pushpanjali Bisht, Advocate for Mr. T.S. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for respondent document dated 13.01.2025 to submit that for the purpose of Providing and laying RCC 900mm and 1400mm I/D Storm water line to provide relief to water logging prone LIG And MIG Houses Of Phase Centre to Mohali Golf Range Phase Brick Masonry Manhole E 180 days. He also informs that the tender process shall be finalized within a period of four weeks from today completion of work shall be adhered to. In view thereof, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 13.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: DHEERAJ KUMAR AND ORS Versus DEEPTI UPPAL AND ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ram Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Ms. Pushpanjali Bisht, Advocate for Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent document dated 13.01.2025 to submit that for the purpose of Providing and laying RCC 900mm and 1400mm I/D Storm water line to provide relief to water logging prone LIG And MIG Houses Of Phase Centre to Mohali Golf Range Phase-11, SAS Nagar including construction of Brick Masonry Manhole E, a tender has been 180 days. He also informs that the tender process shall be finalized within a period of four weeks from today and the timeline prescribed therein for completion of work shall be adhered to. In view thereof, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3451-2024 Date of Decision: January 13, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Ms. Pushpanjali Bisht, Advocate for Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 refers to a tender document dated 13.01.2025 to submit that for the purpose of Providing and laying RCC 900mm and 1400mm I/D Storm water line to provide relief to water logging prone LIG And MIG Houses Of Phase-11 from Community 11, SAS Nagar including construction of been floated against work period of 180 days. He also informs that the tender process shall be finalized within a and the timeline prescribed therein for In view thereof, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2024 2025 refers to a tender document dated 13.01.2025 to submit that for the purpose of Providing and laying RCC 900mm and 1400mm I/D Storm water line to provide relief to ity 11, SAS Nagar including construction of floated against work period of 180 days. He also informs that the tender process shall be finalized within a and the timeline prescribed therein for In view thereof, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the - his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.14 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document