HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31923 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard Shri Azhar Hussain, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. 2. Instant application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed beseeching a direction to the concerned court below to waive the requirement for filing separate sureties as well as personal bond in each of the six cases and accept two sureties and one personal bond for all cases collectively and release the applicant on bail accordingly, details of which are given below:- (1) Case Crime No.786 of 2024 under Sections 305-A, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Tajganj, District Agra. (2) Case Crime No.803 of 2024 under Sections 305-A, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Tajganj, District Agra. (3) Case Crime No.683 of 2024 under Sections 305, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Agra. (4) Case Crime No.802 of 2024 under Sections 305-A, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Tajganj, District Agra. (5) Case Crime No.615 of 2024 under Sections 305, 317 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Agra. (6) Case Crime No.650 of 2024 under Sections 305, 317 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Agra. 3. It is submitted that the present applicant has been inculpated in six Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Azhar Hussain, Mohd Ghufran Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) different criminal cases, however, he has been enlarged on bail in all the six criminal cases by the order passed by the court competent on different dates. At present, he is not in a position to arrange and furnish separate sureties and personal bonds in each case to get himself released in pursuance of the bail orders passed by the court competent. Therefore, he may be permitted to execute one bail bonds and two sureties in one case and same may be treated to be sufficient for the purpose of remaining five criminal cases. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the ratio decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Praesh [SLP (Crl.) No. 8914-8915/2018, decided on 29.10.2018. 4. Learned AGA has not disputed the factum of release of the present applicant in all the six criminal cases on bail and the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). 5. As such, instant application succeeds and is allowed with a direction that the present applicant is at liberty to furnish two sureties and one personal bond of higher amount as may be directed by the court concerned in one bail application i.e. Case Crime No.786 of 2024 under Sections 305-A, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Tajganj, District Agra. Furnishing of two sureties and one personal bond in the said case, as directed above, shall be treated to be good for the purpose of releasing the applicant on bail in the remaining five cases as well, as mentioned above. September 10, 2025 VR NA528 No. 31923 of 2025 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad