MOHAMMAD AKBAR MAGLOO v. VIKAS KUNDAL (JKPCC LIMITED) (WP(C)/2168/2020)
CCP(S)/554/2021 · 2025-05-20
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8934 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8934 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 22 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) No. 554/2021 In WP(C) No. 2168/2020 Mohammad Akbar Magloo …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. A.H. Naik, Sr. Advocate Vs. Vikas Kundal ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jahingeer Ahmad Dar, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 20.05.2025
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since the documents produced by the petitioner have been found genuine, therefore, respondents would pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks. Ordered accordingly. He has also produced a communication received by him with regard to the fact that the documents are genuine. Thus, this petition shall stand closed.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 20.05.2025 Shabroz