1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.244 of 2025 Date of decision: 18.06.2025 Bhuri Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ..Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. : Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner’s grievance was to office order dated 23.01.2025 passed by respondent No.2 in purported compliance to the decision rendered in Bhuri Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.1. Pursuant to the orders passed in this execution petition, learned Additional Advocate General has now placed on record copy of fresh office order issued by respondent No.2 on 17.06.2025. 1 CWP No.3044 of 2020 decided along with connected matters on 13.04.2023. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that fresh order passed by respondent No.2 redresses the grievances of the petitioner. He, however, submits that consequential action based thereupon be directed to be completed within a time-bound schedule. 3. Taking note of office order dated 17.06.2025 now placed on record of the case, this execution petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to do the needful in terms thereof within a period of four weeks. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 18th June, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)