[2025:RJ-JP:11317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3027/2025 Shorabh Indoriya S/o Sushil Kumar Indoriya, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Dokwalo Ki Mori Ke Pas, Ramgarh Sethan, Police Station Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Dhuwan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG and Mr. Anoop Kumar, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.91/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. Investigating is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that basically there was a money dispute between the parties and same has been resolved by the parties amicably. He contends that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody [2025:RJ-JP:11317] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3027/2025] since 08.02.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also looking to the fact that dispute has already been resolved by the parties amicably; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Shorabh Indoriya S/o Sushil Kumar Indoriya shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-491