RELIANCE PROJECTS AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED v. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
WP/37473/2025 · 2025-12-16
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89318 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89318 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53499 WP No. 37473 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 37473 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
RELIANCE PROJECTS AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS RELIANCE CORPORATE IT PARK LIMITED) A 'COMPANY' WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 REGISTERED OFFICE AT: 101, SAFFRON, NEAR CENTER POINT, PANCHWATI 5 RASTA, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT - 380006. WITH ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.62/2, RICHMOND ROAD, BARIGALORE - 560 025, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. MOHAN KUMAR B.E.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANU PRABHAKAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. NARENDRA DEV, MISS GEETHIKA M.A., AND MISS. AISIRI RAJ, ADVOCATES) AND:
1. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATE BANK LTD. UTHKRUSHTA SAHAKARI SOWDHA, KODIALBAIL, MANGALURU - 575 003
2. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR RECOVERY OFFICER SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATE BANK LTD. UTHKRUSHTA SAHAKARI SOWDHA, KODIALBAIL, MANGALURU - 575 003
3. SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL
Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53499 WP No. 37473 of 2025
CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT UTHKRUSHTA SAHAKARI SOWDHA, KODIALBALL, MANGALURU - 575 003 ALSO HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PUTTUR MAIN ROAD, PUTTUR - 574 201 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4. SAHAD RENTAL PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT FORUM HEIGHTS, DARBE, PUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574202 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
5. MR. SULAIMAN K S/O YUSOOF BEARY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT MURABAIL HOUSE KALLADKA POST, GOLTHAMAJALU VILLAGE, BANTWALA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 222
6. MOHAMMAED SALEEL S/O AHMED RESIDING AT PURUSHARA KATTE HOUSE, NARIMOGARU POST AND VILLAGE, PUTTHUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 221
7. MUMTAZ P.
W/O SULAIMAN K RESIDING AT MURABAIL HOUSE KALLADKA POST, GOLTHAMAJALU VILLAGE, BANTWALA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 222
8. HAMID SAHEB, S/O CHATA ISMAIL SAHEB RESIDING AT DOMRADI HOUSE, KADABA POST AND VILLAGE, PUTTHUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 221
9.
MANGALORE REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53499 WP No. 37473 of 2025
DOOR NO 16-1-32/4, 3RD FLOOR, ROHAN CORPORATION, BENDOREWELL, BALMATA ROAD, MANGALORE - 575 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & 2 SRI. RAKSHITH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 R4 TO 9 - D/W V/O DT.16/12/25)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DATED 09.12.2025 IN APPEAL NO. 02/2025-2026. IN APPEAL NO.02/25-26 DOCUMENT NO.1 PRODUCED WITH MEMO DTD. 11.12.2025 PASS AN
ORDER RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS FROM TAKING ANY STEPS TO DISPOSSESS THE PETITIONER DURING THE PENDENCY OF APPEAL BEARING NO. 02/2025-2026. AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned senior advocate for the petitioners, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submit in unison that, since the appeal is still pending before respondent No.1, this writ petition may be disposed off, with a direction to respondent No.1 to dispose off the appeal expeditiously.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53499 WP No. 37473 of 2025
2.
Learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that now the appeal before respondent No.1 is fixed on 19.12.2025. Hence, both the parties may be directed to appear before respondent No.1 on the said date and respondent No.1 may be
directed to dispose off the appeal expeditiously.
3. In view of the above, I proceed to pass the following:
ORDER i) The writ petition stands disposed off. ii) Interim order granted on 11.12.2025 is extended till disposal of the appeal pending before respondent No.1. iii) Both the parties are directed to appear before respondent No.1 in the appeal that is pending
consideration. iv) Respondent No.1 is directed to dispose off the appeal in accordance with law, expeditiously.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53499 WP No. 37473 of 2025
In view of the disposal of main petition, pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and accordingly, the same is disposed off.
SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
PNV - CT:VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1