Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89311 (KAR)

SMT ZEENATH v. SRI KUKKE SUBRAMANESWARA TRADERS

MFA/2825/2024 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.2825/2024 (ECA) (Lok Adalat No.8422/2025) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ZEENATH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O. LATE MOHAMMED AKRAM QUARESHI, 2. MOHAMMED SUHAIB QUARESHI, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, S/O. LATE MOHAMMED AKRAM QUARESHI, 3. SIMRAN FATHIMA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, D/O. LATE MOHAMMED AKRAM QUARESHI, 4. MASTER. MOHAMMED SUHAIL QUARESHI, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, S/O. LATE MOHAMMED AKRAM QUARESHI, 5. SOOFIYA, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, D/O. LATE MOHAMMED AKRAM QUARESHI, 2 ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.13, GROUND FLOOR, MILKAM A STREET, SHANTHI NAGAR, NANJAPPA CIRCLE, MUSEUM ROAD, BANGALORE – 560025, AND ALSO PERMANENT ADDRESS: NO.3-105-2, HALLINGERI HOUSE, KOKKADA, DAKSHINA KANNADA, KARNATAKA – 574198. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VISHWANATHA K., ADVOCATE) AND 1. SRI. KUKKE SUBRAMANESWARA TRADERS, PROP. M. SIREESHA, D/O. LAKSHMI NARASIMHAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, BANDARLAHALLI BEECHAGANAHALLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR, BANGALORE – 560067. AND ALSO DOOR NO.225, T.B. CROSS, BAGEPALLI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, BANGALORE – 560067. 2. THE ICICI LAMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 9TH FLOOR, THE ESTATE 121, DICKENSON ROAD, MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, BANGALORE – 560042, KARNATAKA. (POLICY NO.3003/200013179/00/000) (INSURER OF GOODS CARRYING 3 VEHICLE REG.NO.NL-01-AD -6751). ….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.11.2023 PASSED IN ECA.NO.31/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDITIONAL SCJ AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-24), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 4 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant/claimant, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER TS