CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 218 Bhola @ Bhola Singh v. State of Haryana CORAM: Present: SUKHVINDER KAUR, J. (Oral) 1. grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. under Sections Station Kalanwali, District 2. on the statement of house from Bus Stand and when he reached little ahead of house of the petitioner, son and grandsons who gave beatings to the complainant. Labbi and Rajdeep Singh also reached there and they also the complainant. On raising hue and cry by the complainant, his father came there and tried to rescue the complainant Jaspal Singh. As a result thereof, the father of the complainant -43284-2025 -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bhola @ Bhola Singh State of Haryana CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. Kushager Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana **** SUKHVINDER KAUR, J. (Oral) Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. under Sections 105, 115, 126, 190, 191(2) Kalanwali, District Dabwali. Brief facts of this case are that the present FIR was registered on the statement of Kaka Singh, who stated that when he was going to his house from Bus Stand and when he reached little ahead of house of the petitioner, he stated abusing him. On his r son and grandsons who gave beatings to the complainant. Labbi and Rajdeep Singh also reached there and they also the complainant. On raising hue and cry by the complainant, his father came and tried to rescue the complainant Jaspal Singh. As a result thereof, the father of the complainant 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43284-2025 Date of Decision: 23.9.2025 …Petitioner. …Respondent. HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR , Advocate for the petitioner. Haryana. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 167 dated 20.7.2025 105, 115, 126, 190, 191(2) of BNS, registered at Police facts of this case are that the present FIR was registered , who stated that when he was going to his house from Bus Stand and when he reached little ahead of house of the he stated abusing him. On his resisting, the petitioner called his son and grandsons who gave beatings to the complainant. In the meantime, Labbi and Rajdeep Singh also reached there and they also gave beatings to the complainant. On raising hue and cry by the complainant, his father came and tried to rescue the complainant, but he was pushed by accused Jaspal Singh. As a result thereof, the father of the complainant fell down .9.2025 Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS for 20.7.2025, of BNS, registered at Police facts of this case are that the present FIR was registered , who stated that when he was going to his house from Bus Stand and when he reached little ahead of house of the the petitioner called his In the meantime, gave beatings to the complainant. On raising hue and cry by the complainant, his father came accused fell down GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.09.24 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- and was taken to General Hospital, Kalanwali, where he was declared dead. On the basis of the aforesaid allegat against the 3. has been falsely implicated in the present case and the alleged occurrence. Karnail Singh (f natural death present FIR has been persons. He has prayed that the petitioner is ready and willing to investigation and he be released on 4. was directed to file status report, which was filed on 5. while contending that the and he along with other co Singh, father of the complainant was given a push, due to which he fell down and died. So, in view of entitled to concession of anticipatory bail. 6. through the 7. Singh had pushed he fell down and no such allegation qua the petitioner deceased. Regarding attacking the complainant, attributed to the petitioner. -43284-2025 -2 was taken to General Hospital, Kalanwali, where he was declared dead. On the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the present FIR was registered against the accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and the alleged occurrence. Karnail Singh (father of the complainant) had died natural death, but in order to project it a case of culpable homicide, the present FIR has been wrongly got registered against the petitioner and other He has prayed that the petitioner is ready and willing to investigation and he be released on anticipatory bail. While issuing notice of motion on was directed to file status report, which was filed on Learned State counsel opposed the while contending that the petitioner has been and he along with other co-accused had Singh, father of the complainant was given a push, due to which he fell down and died. So, in view of these serious allegations, the petitioner is not entitled to concession of anticipatory bail. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the relevant material placed on record As per the allegations in the instant FIR Singh had pushed Karnail Singh, the father of the complainant he fell down and when taken to hospital was declared dead. Thus, there is allegation qua the petitioner regarding any overt act pertaining to the eceased. Regarding attacking the complainant, attributed to the petitioner. 2- was taken to General Hospital, Kalanwali, where he was declared dead. ions, the present FIR was registered Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he had not participated in ather of the complainant) had died but in order to project it a case of culpable homicide, the registered against the petitioner and other He has prayed that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the anticipatory bail. While issuing notice of motion on 8.8.2025, respondent-State was directed to file status report, which was filed on 4.9.2025. opposed the present bail application petitioner has been specifically named in the FIR had attacked the complainant. Karnail Singh, father of the complainant was given a push, due to which he fell these serious allegations, the petitioner is not entitled to concession of anticipatory bail. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone relevant material placed on record. in the instant FIR, the co-accused Jaspal the father of the complainant, due to which when taken to hospital was declared dead. Thus, there is regarding any overt act pertaining to the eceased. Regarding attacking the complainant, no specific injury has been was taken to General Hospital, Kalanwali, where he was declared dead. ions, the present FIR was registered Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner he had not participated in ather of the complainant) had died a but in order to project it a case of culpable homicide, the registered against the petitioner and other join the State bail application named in the FIR Karnail Singh, father of the complainant was given a push, due to which he fell these serious allegations, the petitioner is not I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone accused Jaspal due to which when taken to hospital was declared dead. Thus, there is regarding any overt act pertaining to the no specific injury has been GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.09.24 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- 8. for any purpose and no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars. 9. present petition is allowed. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail/surety bonds, to the satisfaction of t conditions, as provided under Section 482(2) of BNSS. It will be open for the Investigating Officer to call the petitioner to join investigation, if so required, by issuing a written notice in thi conditions mentioned in Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 10. be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. The observations recorded above are only for the application. 11. 23.09.2025 gbs -43284-2025 -3 Thus, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for any purpose and no useful purpose would be served by sending the er behind the bars. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail/surety bonds, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions, as provided under Section 482(2) of BNSS. It will be open for the Investigating Officer to call the petitioner to join investigation, if so required, by issuing a written notice in thi conditions mentioned in Section 482(2) of the BNSS. However, nothing observed herein above shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. The observations recorded above are only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 3- he custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for any purpose and no useful purpose would be served by sending the Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail/surety bonds, to the he Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions, as provided under Section 482(2) of BNSS. It will be open for the Investigating Officer to call the petitioner to join investigation, if so required, by issuing a written notice in this regard and he shall abide by the conditions mentioned in Section 482(2) of the BNSS. However, nothing observed herein above shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. The observations purpose of deciding the present bail Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No : Yes/No he custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for any purpose and no useful purpose would be served by sending the Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail/surety bonds, to the he Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions, as provided under Section 482(2) of BNSS. It will be open for the Investigating Officer to call the petitioner to join investigation, if so s regard and he shall abide by the However, nothing observed herein above shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. The observations purpose of deciding the present bail GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.09.24 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document