Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89290 (ALL)

SMT. SUNITA PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/30620/2025 · 2025-09-10

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30620 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.3/Additional District Magistrate (Finance), Prayagraj in considering the Impleadment Application dated 27.3.2024 filed in Case No.202162030006969 of 2021 (Bank of Baroda vs. Patel Cold Storage and others) of the petitioner. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.3/Additional District Magistrate (Finance), Prayagraj should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the Impleadment Application dated 27.3.2024 filed in Case No.202162030006969 of 2021 (Bank of Baroda vs. Patel Cold Storage and others) of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.3/Additional District Magistrate (Finance), prayagraj is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the Impleadment Application dated 27.3.2024 filed in Case No.202162030006969 of 2021 (Bank of Baroda vs. Patel Cold Storage and others) of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. September 11, 2025 Dev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Isa Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt. Sunita Patel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad