JANAB ANSARI @ MD JANAB ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2022/2025 · 2025-03-27
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8929 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8929 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.2022 of 2025
------
1. Janab Ansari @ Md. Janab Ansari, Aged about 48 years, Son of- Moin Miya.
2. Anwar Ansari, aged about 46 years, Son of- Samim Miya
3. Md. Samshad Ansari @ Samshad Ansari, aged about 41 years, Son of- Taiyab Ansari
4. Tauhid Ansari @ Tauhid Ansari, aged about 42 years Son of- Ahir Miyan @ Jahir Miyan
All Residents of Village- Serka, P.O. and P.S. Herhanj, District- Latehar
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 27-03-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Herhanj P.S. Case No.47 of 2024 instituted under Sections 317 (5) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 30 of the Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, Section 21 of Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act and Rule 7/9 of JM (PIMTS) Rules, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in illegal storage of 300 tons of coal. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.1,00,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Latehar in connection with Herhanj P.S. Case No.47 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/