SRI JAGADEESH R A v. UDAYA SOUHARDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE LTD
WP/16680/2022 · 2025-10-13
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89289 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89289 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40382 WP No. 16680 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 16680 OF 2022 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. JAGADEESH R.A., S/O. ANKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT RAMANAHALLI, URAGAPURA POST, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 109
2.
SRI. ANAND KUMAR S/O HANUMANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT RAMANAHALLI, URAGAPURA POST, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 109
3.
SRI. RAMESH A, S/O ANKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT RAMANAHALLI, URAGAPURA POST, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562 109 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJANNA M.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
UDAYA SOUHARDA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LTD., (REG.
UNDER KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI ACT 1997) UDAYA SAHAKARA BHAVANA,
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40382 WP No. 16680 of 2022
NO.29/11, 1ST MAIN, MOUNT JOY RD., HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 019 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI. SREEKANTHA G
2.
THE DEPUTY REGISTER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES SOCIETY UNDER RULE 441, SOUHARADA CO OPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT, KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA SAMYUKATHA CO OPERATIVE LTD., MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI .S., HCGP FOR R2 R1- SD/-)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER BY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION AT ANNX-C DTD. 13.05.2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE R-2 AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTION STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONERS AND ALLOW THE PETITIONERS TO CROSS EXAMINE THE R-1 BANK WITNESS (PW-1) WHICH IS AT ANNX-D BY REOPENING THE PETITION IN DISPUTE NO.
D.R.D/K.S.S.S.S.N/6245/2021-22 AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation.
2. The order sheet dated 09.10.2025 reads as under:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40382 WP No. 16680 of 2022
"Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation.
Even on the last date of hearing i.e. on 16.01.2025, there was no representation.
It is noticed that on 12.10.2022, an order of stay was passed subject to the deposit of 50% of Rs.18,18,736/- within six weeks and also stated that in default of deposit of amount, interim order shall automatically stands cancelled.
It is not informed whether the petitioner has deposited the amount or not and there is also no representation before the Court. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
However, to afford final opportunity, list this matter, as a last chance, on 13.10.2025." In-spite of that, there is no representation. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
MKM CT:VS