2025:HHC:10111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.275 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Kanika Lakhanpal …….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments and as such, same may be disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of judgment, alleged to have been violated. Ordered accordingly. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 10, 2025 (Sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?