Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89273 (PNJ)

AZAD RAKIB v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS

LPA/1807/2019 · 2025-04-29

Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT AZAD RAKIB DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR Present: Mr. Virat Rana, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) 1. Mr. Hit show cause notice dated 05.06.2017, the appellant’s services have already been terminated. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant instructions from his client thereto. 3. In view thereto, present appeal is dismissed. 4. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. 29.04.2025 Mohit goyal 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AZAD RAKIB Vs. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA **** Mr. Virat Rana, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana, submits that in terms of the show cause notice dated 05.06.2017, the appellant’s services have already been terminated. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not have any instructions from his client thereto. In view thereto, present appeal is dismissed. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-1807-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2025 . . . . Appellant NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS . . . . Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Addl. A.G., Haryana. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) esh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana, submits that in terms of the show cause notice dated 05.06.2017, the appellant’s services have submits that he does not have any In view thereto, present appeal is dismissed. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2019 (O&M) .2025 Appellant s esh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana, submits that in terms of the show cause notice dated 05.06.2017, the appellant’s services have submits that he does not have any MOHIT GOYAL 2025.04.30 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document